Contact Person

Dr. Elinor Switzer

Managing Editor

Phone: +49 (0)711 - 8931-230
Fax: +49 (0)711 - 8931-323
send an Email


Accuracy of emergency physician–performed ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis

Journal: Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN: 0340-6245
Issue: 2013: 109/1 (Jan) pp. 1–173
Pages: 137-145

Accuracy of emergency physician–performed ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Online Supplementary Material

F. Pomero (1), F. Dentali (2), V. Borretta (1), M. Bonzini (3), R. Melchio (1), J. D. Douketis (4), L. M. Fenoglio (1)

(1) Department of Clinical Medicine, ASO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy; (2) Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; (3) Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Center, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; (4) Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada


Ultrasound, Deep-vein thrombosis, emergency physician


Duplex ultrasound is the first-line diagnostic test for detecting lower limb deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) but it is time consuming, requires patient transport, and cannot be interpreted by most physicians. The accuracy of emergency physician–performed ultrasound (EPPU) for the diagnosis of DVT, when performed at the bedside, is unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, aiming to provide reliable data on the accuracy of EPPU in the diagnosis of DVT. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (up to August 2012) were systematically searched for studies evaluating the accuracy of EPPU compared to either colour-flow duplex ultrasound performed by a radiology department or vascular laboratory, or to angiography, in the diagnosis of DVT. Weighted mean sensitivity and specificity and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects regression approach. There were 16 studies included, with 2,379 patients. The pooled prevalence of DVT was 23.1% (498 in 2,379 patients), ranging from 7.4% to 47.3%. Using the bivariate approach, the weighted mean sensitivity of EPPU compared to the reference imaging test was 96.1% (95%CI 90.6–98.5%), and with a weighted mean specificity of 96.8% (95%CI:94.6–98.1%). Our findings suggest that EPPU may be useful in the management of patients with suspected DVT. Future prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

You may also be interested in...

P. Krackowizer, E. Brenner

Phlebologie 2008 37 2: 83-92

W. Blättler 1 , H. E. Gerlach2

Phlebologie 2005 34 3: 146-156

Alexander T. Cohen 1, Giancarlo Agnelli 2, Frederick A. Anderson 3, Juan I. Arcelus 4, David Bergqvist 5, Josef G. Brecht 6, Ian A. Greer 7, John A. Heit 8, Julia L. Hutchinson 9, Ajay K. Kakkar 10, Dominique Mottier 1 1, Emmanuel Oger 1 1, Meyer-Michel Samama 1 2, Michael Spannagl13 for the VTE Impact Assessment Group in Europe (VITAE)

Thromb Haemost 2007 98 4: 756-764