Contact Person

Dr. Elinor Switzer

Managing Editor

Phone: +49 (0)711 - 8931-230
Fax: +49 (0)711 - 8931-323
send an Email


Familial risk of venous thromboembolism in first-, second- and third-degree relatives: a nationwide family study in Sweden

Journal: Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN: 0340-6245

Theme Issue
Highlights from the IVBM 2012

Issue: 2013: 109/3 (Mar) pp. 361-567
Pages: 458-463

Familial risk of venous thromboembolism in first-, second- and third-degree relatives: a nationwide family study in Sweden

See also Editorial by Margaglione

Erratum in Issue 110/1

B. Zöller (1), H. Ohlsson (1, 2), J. Sundquist (1, 2), K. Sundquist (1)

(1) Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden; (2) Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA


Risk Factors, epidemiological studies, Deep venous thrombosis, thrombosis, thrombophilia


Venous thromboembolism (VTE) clusters in families, but the familial risk of VTE has only been determined in first-degree relatives. This nationwide study aimed to determine the familial risk of VTE in first-, second- and third-degree relatives of affected individuals. The Swedish Multi-Generation Register was linked to Hospital Discharge Register data for the period 1987–2009. This was a case-cohort study. Odds ratios (ORs) for VTE were calculated for individuals whose relatives were hospitalised for VTE, as determined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), and those whose relatives were unaffected by VTE. The familial OR for VTE was 2.49 in siblings (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.40–2.58), 2.65 in children (2.50–2.80), 2.09 in parents (2.03–2.15), 1.52 in maternal half-siblings (1.26–1.85), 2.34 in paternal half-siblings (2.00–2.73), 1.69 in nieces/nephews (1.57–1.82), 1.47 in cousins (1.33–1.64), and 1.14 in spouses of individuals diagnosed with VTE (1.09–1.18). Familial clustering was stronger at young ages. The familial transmission was slightly stronger for males compared with females but was only significant for siblings 1.13 (1.05–1.22) and parents 1.11 (1.05–1.78) of probands. The present data showing an increased VTE risk among not only first-degree relatives but also second- and third-degree relatives indicate that the genetic component of the familial clustering of VTE is strong. Family history is a potentially useful genetic surrogate marker for clinical VTE risk assessment, even in second- and third degree-relatives.

You may also be interested in...

Folkert W. Asselbergs 1, Scott M. Williams 2, Patricia R. Hebert 3, Christopher S. Coffey 4, Hans L. Hillege 1, Gerjan Navis 5, Douglas E. Vaughan 2, Wiek H. van Gilst1,6, Jason H. Moore7

Thromb Haemost 2006 96 4: 471-477


Karen Koopman 1; Maarten Uyttenboogaart 1; Patrick C. A. J. Vroomen 1; Jan van der Meer2*; Jacques De Keyser1,3;
Gert-Jan Luijckx1

Thromb Haemost 2009 102 4: 620-622

N. Bauer, A. Moritz

Tierärztliche Praxis Kleintiere 2008 36 4: 235-246